I just heard wind that one of the National Anarchist comrades on the street in Melbourne has been attacked by a red fascist, most likely involved with the Socialist Alternative. The Socialist Alternative, or SA, also known as the Trotskyist Stormtroopers/Red Shirts are the major Communist sympathisers in Melbourne; they've taken over from the Socialist Alliance that have taken a more parliamentary approach.
Anyway, as a National Anarchist I entirely support the ripping down of as many red fascist posters as possible. The Communists have taken control of street activism in Melbourne and have made it their business to stop any other form of political activism on “their streets.” Though I agree with at least the basis of a few SA points (anti-globalisation, anti-capitalism) I fear that those not yet politicised, working joes will attend the meetings and simply be indoctrinated with Trotskyist nonsense that will do naught but lead the public in the direction of more state controlled mass slaughter after another Communist “Revolution.”
Back to the story; the comrade on the street was heading down the red infested Brunswick St in Melbourne ripping down posters when he was approached by a much older man, presumably in his 30's that questioned the N-A activist about what he was doing. The activist made it clear he was a National Anarchist and was against the advertising by groups that advocate the dogmatic ideology that has killed millions in the past. After a short debate, the activist continued down the street ripping down posters when out of no where, he was jumped from behind by the same red fascist that he was peacefully debating only minutes earlier!!
The scuffle was brief with the red fascist having the upper hand due to his cowardly attack from behind, the N-A activist managed to score a few punches to the face before another National Anarchist activist came from no where and defended his comrade from the attack, forcing the Trotskyist coward in to a restaurant where he audibly claimed to be “sorry!”... SORRY FOR WHAT? BEING A COWARD THAT ATTACKS FROM BEHIND!
The two activists hailed abuse upon the weak dog for a few seconds before making their way down the street in search of more posters, allying to finish a mission that was now well deserved. From the explanation given by the victim of the callous attack, the comrades ripped down every red poster in sight on a number of blocks before making their way home after a job well done.
I'd like to extend my solidarity to the street activists in Melbourne for their stirling work in taking the fight to the red fascists! We as National Anarchists will not be bullied by those that wish to control who we are as people and turn us in to economic robots with no mind or cultural identity. To the RED DOG that attacked the National Anarchist activist this evening, AT LEAST HAVE THE BALLS TO FRONT OUR COMRADES HEAD ON, YOU WEAK PRICK!
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bbIpgGKtj5Y
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uzjuE5ahetA
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5RusXQvhcvE


3 comments:
mate I heard about this!
From what I hear the brother who got attacked did nothing to provoke the old dude.
Just goes to show that the red fascists never change.
Its all peace and love "fight the system" right up till the point where you disagree with the fuckers.
THEY ARE THE SYSTEM! And its cockgobblers like that who are keeping the rest of us down.
Good work to the brother who stepped in and taught the red a lesson, violence is regretable but this was clear cut self defence.
Some people have views about the world we live in which are horrible from our own point of sight. But that is the way they see it. As long us they would not hurt us and the ones we love much, all we can do is to watchfully wait for their next step and respect their philosophies.
Unfortunately it's not just the Socialists that are capable of such things. The wider anarchist movement in Australia is having something of a fit about National Anarchism. It doesn't fit into their totalitarian ideas of what anarchism is so it must be crushed apparently.
Post a Comment