Saturday, August 16, 2008

Anglo-Saxon Ethnocentrism and the Weakness of "White Nationalism"

I was fortunate enough to hear Professor Andrew Fraser of Macquarie University fame speak at the Australian League of Rights in Melbourne yesterday. Professor Fraser was met with thought-crime controversy in 2006 when he suggested that African populations are directly related to increased crime in the areas they settle. Drew was kicked out of his University faculty position and denounced as a "racist" by the lamestream media. He is now writing a book called Anglo-Saxon Anglophobia and is invited to speak at many conferences and political events.

Professor Fraser spoke about the need for stronger ethnocentrism amongst the Anglo-Saxon ethnic group and a break from the traditional individualism that plagues Anglo populations around the world. Anglo-Saxons have always been a succesful people; renowned for being inventors, entrepreneurs, politicians etc. yet this success has failed to collectively further the interests of Anglo-Saxon peoples. Politicians George W. Bush, John Howard and businessman like Michael Chaney and Chris Corrigan have all done well for themselves but more often than not have done more harm to their own folk than good. Many would say, "who cares, they're the enemy anyway," this is definitely the case but why aren't we publically shaming these people and all those like them?

Those peoples that have come to success since the end of the Colonial Empires have been those with the most ethnocentrism. The Chinese, the Japanese, the Jews are all shining examples of ethnocentrism at work. Jewish businessman and other influential Jewish figures play a large role in supporting Israel and other Zionist groups, any Jew that acts against Jewish interests is shamed as a "self-hating Jew." This sort of collective altruism for their own kind is what gives Jews the upper hand in almost all positions of power and influence. The case is similar for the Asian ethnicities. This is not something to hate or resent, though it is definitely something to envy and strive to emulate for ourselves!

It is so common to see on public transport, groups of Asians, Indians or Africans huddled together talking in their native tongues to the exclusion of others. Yet, almost every European except those who are travelling together are straight faced and silent, not interested in talking with anyone and worried about causing offence. It is this rabid individualism that has stripped any sense of ethnic solidarity from Anglo-Saxons. Even other European ethnic groups such as Greeks and Serbs have a stronger ethnocentrism in Australia than do the Anglo-Saxon majority. For me to even discuss this sort of solidarity is in the mind of Anglos to be "racism" yet any other group (including other Europeans) that exhibit the same feelings is totally normal. The refusal of Anglo-Saxons to collectively work towards their own interests or even acknowledge their own identity is the key to Fraser's concept of Anglo-Saxon Anglophobia.

It has been suggested in recent lamestream news that Europeans in America will be a minority by 2042, the figures will be similar in Canada, Australia and Europe itself. Though the article speaks about all Europeans, this trend will most likely effect Anglo-Saxons more than any other, being one of the least ethnically conscious groups that make up white Europeans. With this being the case, it is obviously essential for Anglo-Saxons to collectively work towards their own interests.

We need to create a cultural rebirth for Anglo-Saxons, if we are to exist as an ethnic group and hold our heads above water in the future. The Jews have Zionism, we need a sort of Anglo-Saxonism ourselves! This cultural rebirth and what process it will take can be debated forever, Professor Fraser suggested a spiritual awakening through the Anglican faith and illustrated the mythology of the "Patriot King." I think our need is dire and I personally believe Christianity is a massive failure in the fight for ethnic Nationalism and awaiting anything from the royal bloodline is defeatism. We need to act now and the first step is recognising ourselves as Anglo-Saxons.

Take interest in Northern European (especially British Isles specific) festivals, encourage an awareness of our Anglo-Saxon history and heritage. Acknowledge other Anglos in public, nod or wave, or strike up a conversation. Try to shop at Anglo-Saxon owned businesses over others, try to employ other Anglos and help out other Anglos in financial need. It should be noted (and Fraser said this) that the State has done all it can to squeeze out and abolish any opportunity for Anglo-Saxons to discriminate in favour of their own kind, our businesses are restricted from employing Anglos over non-Anglos and we are unable to form Anglo-specific clubs or organisations to lobby for our interests. It must be known that the State is the enemy of all people and Anglo-Saxons especially because our demographic and cultural genocide is directly related to the Nation-State we foolishly created! Despite this, we really must do all we can to create a parallel society for Anglo-Saxons interests and identity!

The title of this article speaks of the weakness of "White Nationalism" and I will discuss this here. White Nationalism or Nationalism for everyone identifying as white European is a phenomenon dating back a number of decades. Many Nationalists and ethnically conscious people come in to the Nationalist movement through the concept of pan-European solidarity or "White Nationalism." The most well known and controversial racial Nationalist website on the net is Stormfront, a self-declared "White Nationalist community." The first problem with White Nationalism is - what is white?

Never in the history of Europeans have the various European ethnic groups considered themselves entirely the same. The Greeks have always identified as Greek, Croats always as Croats, Germans always as Germans and so on. There is no biological identification of "white," there is no totally collective "white history" except when meshing the various histories of European ethnic groups together. As a Nationalist activist, I've always found it difficult to describe and create identification in people of being "Whites," it has always been easier for people to relate to and be passionate about their personal ethnicity. In Melbourne the various European ethnic groups with strong ethnocentrism has held huge rallies, Hellas and anti-Kosovo rallies have frequently numbered in the thousands - pan-European rallies have never numbered this high. The solidarity expressed by specific ethnic groups is more powerful than White Nationalism (an Anglo-Saxon concept) has ever been.

It is true that White Nationalism is an Anglo-Saxon concept and another example of Anglophobia and self-weakness amongst Anglos. Anglo-Saxons are forever trying to mould themselves with the more ethnocentric European groups and ride on their success, even if it means serving their interests above our own. It is time for Anglo-Saxons to stand out ourselves, ride alone to further our own ethnic interests and build solidarity as a small yet proud ethnicity. I am not saying we should reject the other European Nationalist groups, working with Greeks and Serbs against common enemies like Islamic pressue in Europe and cultural Marxism is a good idea and follows the concept of coalition movements. Anglos must get over their own self-hatred and act as a collective that doesn't need help from others.

The strengthening of ethnic solidarity amongst Europeans can only benefit our collective Nationalist movement. The idea of White Nationalism is subsidising our personal identities and weakens us in the long term. Ethnic Solidarity and the end of Anglo-Saxon Anglophobia is an idea whose time has come!

0 comments: